4.2 Article

Trends in ixodid tick abundance and distribution in Great Britain

Journal

MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 238-247

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00734.x

Keywords

Ixodes ricinus; Lagopus lagopus scoticus; abundance; Cervidae; deer; distribution; Ixodidae; tick-borne disease; Great Britain

Funding

  1. Defra [SE4105]
  2. EU [GOCE-2003-010284 EDEN]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The popular, but rarely documented, view in Britain is that ticks have increased in distribution and abundance over recent years. To assess this, we gathered evidence for chanoes in tick distribution and abundance by distributing a survey questionnaire throughout Britain and by analysing trends in the prevalence of tick infestation oil red grouse chicks Lagopus lagopus scoticus Latham (Galliformes: Tetranoidae), gathered over 19 years at three Scottish sites, and on deer (Cetartiodactyla: Cervidae) C culled over I I years on 26 Ministry of Defence (MoD) estates. Based on the survey. the current known distribution of Ixodes ricinus Linnaeus (Acari: Ixodidae) has expanded by 17% in comparison with the previously known distribution. The survey indicated that people perceive there to be more ticks today than in the past at 73% of locations throughout Britain. Reported increases in tick numbers coincided spatially with perceived increases in deer numbers. At locations where both tick and deer numbers were reported to have increased, these perceived changes occurred at similar times, raising the possibility of a causal link. At other locations, tick numbers were perceived to have increased despite reported declines in deer numbers. The perceptions revealed by the survey were corroborated by quantitative data front red grouse chicks and culled deer. Tick infestation prevalence increased over time on all grouse moors and 77% of MoD estates and decreased at six locations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available