4.5 Article

Effect of Low-Dose, Long-Term Roxithromycin on Airway Inflammation and Remodeling of Stable Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Journal

MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION
Volume 2014, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2014/708608

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Experiment Center of Guangxi Medical University
  2. Special Foundation for Chronic Respiratory Disease of Chinese Medical Association [07010150023]
  3. Youth Science Fund of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in China [0991019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is characterized by airway expansion and recurrent acute exacerbations. Macrolide has been shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory effects in some chronic airway diseases. Objective. To assess the efficacy of roxithromycin on airway inflammation and remodeling in patients with NCFB under steady state. Methods. The study involved an open-label design in 52 eligible Chinese patients with NCFB, who were assigned to control (receiving no treatment) and roxithromycin (receiving 150mg/day for 6 months) groups. At baseline and 6 months, the inflammatory markers such as interleukin- (IL-) 8, neutrophil elastase (NE), matrix metalloproteinase- (MMP) 9, hyaluronidase (HA), and type IV collagen in sputum were measured, along with the detection of dilated bronchus by throat computed tomography scan, and assessed the exacerbation. Results. Forty-three patients completed the study. The neutrophil in the sputum was decreased in roxithromycin group compared with control (P < 0.05). IL-8, NE, MMP-9, HA, and type IV collagen in sputum were also decreased in roxithromycin group compared with the control group (all P < 0.01). Airway thickness of dilated bronchus and exacerbation were reduced in roxithromycin group compared with the control (all P < 0.05). Conclusions. Roxithromycin can reduce airway inflammation and airway thickness of dilated bronchus in patients with NCFB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available