4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of Cu2O/TiO2 photocatalysts for H-2 evolution from aqueous solution with different scavengers

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages 736-744

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.027

Keywords

Cuprous oxide; p-n heterojunction; Photocatalyst; Different scavengers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of Cu2O/TiO2 photocatalysts with different molar fraction of Cu2O were prepared by a facile modified ethanol-induced approach followed by a calcination process. The chemical state of copper compound was proved to be cuprous oxide by the characterization of X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS). Furthermore, these composite oxides were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), N-2 adsorption desorption and UV-vis techniques to study the morphologies, structures, and optical properties of the as-prepared samples. The results indicated that the photocatalytic activity of n-type TiO2 was significantly enhanced by combined with p-type Cu2O, due to the efficient p-n heterojunction. The p-n heterojunction between Cu2O and TiO2 can enhance visible-light adsorption, efficiently suppress charge recombination, improve interfacial charge transfer, and especially provide plentiful reaction active sites on the surface of photocatalyst. As a consequence, the prepared 2.5-Cu2O/TiO2 photocatalyst exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity for H-2 evolution rate and reached 2048.25 mu mol/(g h), which is 14.48 times larger than that of pure P25. The apparent quantum yield (AQY) of the 2.5-Cu2O/TiO2 sample at 365 nm was estimated to be 4.32%. In addition, the influence of different scavengers, namely methanol, anhydrous ethanol, ethylene glycol and glycerol, on the photocatalytic activity for H-2 evolution rate was discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available