4.5 Article

From laboratory tests to functional characterisation of Cockayne syndrome

Journal

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 134, Issue 5-6, Pages 171-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2013.03.007

Keywords

UV damage; Oxidative stress; Neurodegeneration; Ageing; Cancer

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)
  2. Istituto Superiore Sanita-Programma Malattie Rare
  3. European Community [SC1-232, CHRX-CT94-0443, MRTN-CT-2003-503618, LSHM-CT-2005-512117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The significant progress made over the last few years on the pathogenesis of Cockayne syndrome (CS) greatly improved our knowledge on several aspects crucial for development and ageing, demonstrating that this disorder, even if rare, represents a valuable tool to clarify key aspects of human health. Primary cells from patients have been instrumental to elucidate the multiple roles of CS proteins and to approach the dissection of the complex interplay between repair and transcription that is central to the CS clinical phenotype. Here we discuss the results of the cellular assays applied for confirmation of the clinical diagnosis as well as the results of genetic and molecular studies in DNA repair defective patients. Furthermore, we provide a general overview of recent in vivo and in vitro studies indicating that both CSA and CSB proteins are involved in distinct aspects of the cellular responses to UV and oxidative stress, transcription and regulation of gene expression, chromatin remodelling, redox balance and cellular bioenergetics. In light of the literature data, we will finally discuss how inactivation of specific functional roles of CS proteins may differentially affect the phenotype, thus explaining the wide range in type and severity of symptoms reported in CS patients. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available