4.5 Article

Age-related differences in the expression of circulating microRNAs: miR-21 as a new circulating marker of inflammaging

Journal

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 133, Issue 11-12, Pages 675-685

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2012.09.004

Keywords

Circulating microRNA; Centenarians; Centenarians offspring; Circulating miR-21

Funding

  1. Italian Health Ministry: Universita Politecnica delle Marche [RFPS-2007-6-654027]
  2. INRCA - Programma Strategico [RFPS-2007-6-654027]
  3. Universita Politecnica delle Marche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circulating microRNAs (miRs) have been investigated as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers in human diseases. However, little is known about their expression throughout the aging process. Eleven healthy individuals aged 20,80 and 100 years underwent miR plasma profiling. The validation cohort consisted of 111 healthy adults (CTR) aged 20-105 years and included 30 centenarians. In addition, 34 patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 15 healthy centenarian offspring (CO) were enrolled. An exploratory factorial analysis grouped the miRs into three main factors: factor 1 primarily higher in 20-year-old subjects, but these differences did not reach statistical significance, factor 2 primarily higher in octogenarians and factor 3 primarily higher in centenarians. MiR-21, the most highly expressed miR of factors 2 and 3, was further validated, confirming the differences in the age groups. MiR-21 expression was higher in the CVD patients and lower in the CO compared to the age-matched CTR. MiR-21 was correlated with C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels. TGF-beta signaling was the predicted common pathway targeted by miRs of factors 2 and 3. TGF-beta R2 mRNA, a validated miR-21 target, showed the highest expression in the leukocytes from a subset of the octogenarians. Our findings suggest that miR-21 may be a new biomarker of inflammation. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available