4.7 Article

Pitch cone design and influence of misalignments on tooth contact behaviors of crossed beveloid gears

Journal

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 48-64

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.08.008

Keywords

Beveloid gears; Pitch cone design; Tooth contact analysis; Gear misalignments

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [CDJXS11111138]
  3. Program for Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program in the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period of China [2011BAF09B07]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51175523]
  5. Mechanical Engineering in the School of Dynamic Systems at the University of Cincinnati

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pitch cone design theory assuming line contact is formulated to analyze the tooth engagement behavior of crossed beveloid gears. The analysis applies the spatial gearing model and beveloid gear manufacturing technique to determine the cutter parameters and geometry. Using the proposed procedure, a crossed beveloid gear pair with small shaft angle is studied. Also, the proposed formulation is capable of quantifying the influence of misalignments including offset and angular position errors on the contour and position of contact path and lines over a complete mesh cycle. The results show that both offset and angular position errors of the mating members worsen the conjugate action of the mating tooth surfaces. Furthermore, both the contact path and the transmission error are more sensitive to the angular error than the offset error. The loaded tooth contact characteristics are subsequently modeled using the finite element method for comparison purpose. The proposed model is partially validated by comparing the numerical simulation results. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available