4.7 Article

Filler aggregation as a reinforcement mechanism in polymer nanocomposites

Journal

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 79-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.02.004

Keywords

Polyethylene; Silica; Nanocomposites; Elastic modulus; Modelling

Funding

  1. [AFOSR- FA9550-11-1-0204]
  2. [NSF-0600675/1140065]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1140065] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Significant reinforcing effects that are often observed in polymer nanoparticulate composites are usually attributed to strong interfacial interactions over extended interfaces in these systems. Here, we study linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) reinforced with 1-4% fumed silica nanoparticles. Nanocomposite modulus, evaluated as a function of filler volume fraction, significantly exceeds classical micromechanics predictions. Possible reasons for the observed discrepancy are evaluated experimentally and theoretically. It is concluded that primary nanoparticle aggregation rather than polymer-nanoparticle interaction at the interface is mainly responsible for the observed reinforcement effect. A simple micromechanics-informed model of a composite with primary particle aggregates is presented based on the model of secondary aggregation developed earlier. The model is shown capable of predicting nanocomposites behavior by introducing a single new structural parameter with a straightforward physical interpretation. As nanoparticles are prone to agglomerate, their primary or secondary aggregates may be present in many nanocomposite systems and the aggregation state and its effects need to be thoroughly evaluated, along with the classical interfacial interactions. The described reinforcing mechanism may be responsible for other anomalous property changes in nanoparticulate composites reported in the literature. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available