4.7 Article

A stochastic collocation approach for efficient integrated gear health prognosis

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 39, Issue 1-2, Pages 372-387

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.03.004

Keywords

Integrated prognostics; Polynomial chaos expansion; Stochastic collocation; Gear; Bayesian inference; Remaining useful life prediction

Funding

  1. Le Fonds quebecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uncertainty quantification in damage growth is critical in equipment health prognosis and condition based maintenance. Integrated health prognostics has recently drawn growing attention due to its capability to produce more accurate predictions through integrating physical models and real-time condition monitoring data. In the existing literature, simulation is commonly used to account for the uncertainty in prognostics, which is inefficient. In this paper, instead of using simulation, a stochastic collocation approach is developed for efficient integrated gear health prognosis. Based on generalized polynomial chaos expansion, the approach is utilized to evaluate the uncertainty in gear remaining useful life prediction as well as the likelihood function in Bayesian inference. The collected condition monitoring data are incorporated into prognostics via Bayesian inference to update the distributions of uncertainties at given inspection times. Accordingly, the distribution of the remaining useful life is updated. Compared to conventional simulation methods, the stochastic collocation approach is much more efficient, and is capable of dealing with high dimensional probability space. An example is used to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available