4.7 Article

Bearing performance degradation assessment using locality preserving projections and Gaussian mixture models

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 2573-2588

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.02.006

Keywords

Bearing performance degradation assessment; Bearing; Fault diagnosis; Locality preserving projections; Feature extraction; Gaussian mixture model

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71001060]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20103108120010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sensitivity of various features that are characteristics of machine performance may vary significantly under different working conditions. Thus it is critical to devise a systematic feature extraction (FE) approach that provides a useful and automatic guidance on using the most effective features for machine performance prediction without human intervention. This paper proposes a locality preserving projections (LPP)-based FE approach. Different from principal component analysis (PCA) that aims to discover the global structure of the Euclidean space, LPP is capable to discover local structure of the data manifold. This may enable LPP to find more meaningful low-dimensional information hidden in the high-dimensional observations compared with PCA. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for bearing defect and severity classification is evaluated experimentally on bearing test-beds. Furthermore, a novel health assessment indication, Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based negative log likelihood probability (NLLP) is developed to provide a comprehensible indication for quantifying bearing performance degradation. The proposed approach has shown to provide better performance than using regular features (e.g., root mean square (RMS)). The experimental results indicate potential applications of LPP-based FE and GMM as effective tools for bearing performance degradation assessment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available