4.5 Article

A size-dependent Reddy-Levinson beam model based on a strain gradient elasticity theory

Journal

MECCANICA
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 1427-1441

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-014-9912-2

Keywords

Micro scale; Reddy-Levinson beam; Size effect; Strain gradient elasticity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11202117, 11272186]
  2. Natural Science Fund of Shandong Province [ZR2012AM014, BS2012ZZ006]
  3. Opening funds of State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics and Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A size-dependent Reddy-Levinson beam model is developed based on a strain gradient elasticity theory. Governing equations and boundary conditions are derived by using Hamilton's principle. The model contains three material length scale parameters, which may effectively capture the size effect in micron or sub-micron. This model can degenerate into the modified couple stress model or even the classical model if two or all material length scale parameters are taken to be zero respectively. In addition, the present model recovers the micro scale Timoshenko and Bernoulli-Euler beam models based on the same strain gradient elasticity theory. To illustrate the new model, the static bending and free vibration problems of a simply supported micro scale Reddy-Levinson beam are solved respectively; the results are compared with the reduced models. Numerical results reveal that the differences in the deflection, rotation and natural frequency predicted by the present model and the other two reduced Reddy-Levinson models are getting larger as the beam thickness is comparable to the material length scale parameters. These differences, however, are decreasing or even diminishing with the increase of the beam thickness. This study may be helpful to characterize the mechanical properties of small scale beam-like structures for a wide range of potential applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available