4.7 Article

Shelf life of fresh foal meat under MAP, overwrap and vacuum packaging conditions

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 610-618

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.06.008

Keywords

Foal meat; Microbiology; Physico-chemical; Sensorial quality; Shelf life

Funding

  1. Xunta de Galicia (The Regional Government) [10MRU004CT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to investigate the physico-chemical properties, the microbial counts and the sensory properties' changes of foal steaks packed under various conditions. The experimental packaging systems were: (i) vacuum packaging (VP), (ii) overwrap packaging and (iii) two modified atmosphere packaging methods (MAP): high O-2 MAP (80% O-2 + 20% CO2) and low O-2 MAP (30% O-2 + 70% CO2). The meat was stored at 2 degrees C during 14 days and tested for pH, colour, lipid and protein oxidation, microbial counts and sensory assessment of odour, colour and appearance. Of the two MAP, overwrap and VP, both MAP were the most effective treatments for the inhibition of the total viable counts (TVC), Pseudomonas spp., psychrotrophic aerobic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria. Enterobacteriaceae as well as moulds and yeast. According to the sensory evaluation, foal steaks packed under overwrap and MAP treatments resulted unacceptable after 7 days of storage, whereas the vacuum-packed meat was still acceptable. Moreover, the redness value decreased significantly (P < 0.001) with all treatments during the storage time, except for the vacuum packs, which increased significantly (P < 0.001). Finally, foal steaks from overwrap packaging and MAP conditions had a greater increase of TBAR'S values and carbonyl content during the storage time. High O-2 levels affected foal meat quality negatively, while anaerobic conditions extended the meat's shelf life up to 14 days. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available