4.7 Review

Authentication of meat and meat products

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 577-587

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.001

Keywords

Authentication; Authenticity; Fraud; Meat; Meat fraud; Meat products; Mislabelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, interest in meat authenticity has increased. Many consumers are concerned about the meat they eat and accurate labelling is important to inform consumer choice. Authentication methods can be categorised into the areas where fraud inmost likely to occur: meat origin, meat substitution, meat processing treatment and non-meat ingredient addition. Within each area the possibilities for fraud can be subcategorised as follows: meat origin sex, meat cuts, breed, feed intake, slaughter age, wild versus farmed meat, organic versus conventional meat, and geographic origin; meat substitution meat species, fat, and protein; meat processing treatment irradiation, fresh versus thawed meat and meat preparation; non-meat ingredient addition additives and water. Analytical methods used in authentication are as diverse as the authentication problems, and include a diverse range of equipment and techniques. This review is intended to provide an overview of the possible analytical methods available for meat and meat products authentication. In areas where no authentication methods have been published, possible strategies are suggested. (C) 2010 The American Meat Science Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available