4.7 Article

Comparison of glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, ribose, and mannose as flavour precursors in pork; the effect of monosaccharide addition on flavour generation

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 419-425

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.08.018

Keywords

Flavour; Aroma volatiles; Glucose; Glucose 6-phosphate; Ribose; Ribose 5-phosphate; Mannose; Maillard reaction; Pork; Meat

Funding

  1. Danish Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation
  2. Danish Pig Levy Fund
  3. Centre for Advanced Food Science (LMC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, mannose and ribose on the generation of aroma volatiles in pork was investigated. The monosaccharides were added individually to minced pork prior to heat treatment (160 degrees C for 10 min) in the following concentrations: glucose (27.5 mu mol/g), ribose (1.2 mu mol/g), mannose (8.3 mu mol/g) and glucose 6-phosphate (0.5 mu mol/g). The natural concentrations of the monosaccharides in the pork used were found to be 4.0 mu mol/g for glucose, 0.1 mu mol/g for ribose. 0.3 mu mol/g for mannose and 2.6 mu mol/g for glucose 6-phosphate. The major aroma compounds identified in the head-space of the heated samples were pyrazines, aldehydes (Strecker and lipid-derived). ketones, and sulphides. Glucose generated the highest amounts of volatiles followed by glucose 6-phosphate. However, when related to the added concentration of glucose 6-phosphate, this phosphorylated monosaccharide showed the highest aroma generating potential. The addition of ribose did not increase the concentration of volatiles compared with pork without the added monosaccharide. The fates of ribose 5-phosphate and ribose in pork were studied over time. The concentrations of ribose and ribose 5-phosphate clearly decreased during 2 h equilibration, which may be due to enzymatic activities. These precursors may, therefore, be less important pork flavour precursors than glucose and glucose 6-phosphate. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available