4.7 Article

The impact of new generation pre-dressing medium-voltage electrical stimulation on tenderness and colour stability in lamb meat

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 683-691

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.036

Keywords

medium voltage; electrical stimulation; lamb; meat quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous work identified that a large number of domestic lamb carcases processed in Australia do not meet the recommended pH/temperature window during chilling. New medium voltage electrical stimulation technology has been developed to alleviate this problem. This study used an optimised setting (800 mA with a pulse width 0.5 ms) to evaluate the effects on meat quality with a focus on tenderness and meat colour. In total 40 (electrically stimulated) and 40 (non electrically stimulated) lambs from I I lots killed over 2 days were evaluated. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between stimulation treatments for initial pH, rate of pH decline and the predicted temperature at pH 6.0. There was also a large difference in the number of carcases that met the recommended window (pH of 6.0, between 18 and 25 degrees C), with an average 67.5% of stimulated carcases and 25% of unstimulated carcases meeting or failing just above the recommended window. The stimulation treatment had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on sarcomere length or myofibrillar fragmentation index (MFI) of the m. longissimus (LL). After 1 day of ageing LL samples from stimulated carcases had a significantly lower (P < 0.05) shear force than non stimulated samples, but there was no difference between stimulation treatments after 5 days ageing. However, ageing period did have a significant effect (P < 0.001) on both MFI and shear force, such that 5 days aged product had higher MFI and lower shear force values. There were minimal effects of stimulation on colour stability. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available