4.5 Article

Wettability measurement apparatus for porous material using the modified Washburn method

Journal

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/24/12/125902

Keywords

modified Washburn method; wettability; penetration rate; LabVIEW; nano-coating

Funding

  1. Shah Schulman Center for Surface Science and Nanotechnology
  2. Anchor Institute of chemical and petrochemical sector of the Dharmsinh Desai University, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work a cost-effective instrument for measuring the wettability of powder materials was designed and developed, which works on the modified Washburn method. The instrument measures the mass gain against time due to penetration of the liquid into the powder materials using a microbalance and LabVIEW-based data acquisition system. The wettability characteristic of different powders was determined from the contact angle using the modified Washburn equation. To demonstrate the performance of the developed instrument, the wettability of as-received corn starch and nano-coated corn starch powders was estimated with water as a test liquid. The corn starch powders coated with hydrophilic grade (Aerosil 200P) and hydrophobic grade (Aerosil R972) nanoparticles at different coating levels showed expected changes in their contact angle. Some of the results were also verified against the available standard instrument for wettability measurement and found to be consistent. The present configuration of the instrument costs about 500 US$ which is 15 to 20 times less than the available advanced models. The developed instrument is thus a cost-effective solution for wettability measurement which can be used for materials in food processing, pharmaceuticals, horticulture, textile manufacturing, civil engineering etc. The developed instrument is expected to help many small scale industries or research labs who cannot afford an expensive instrument for wettability studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available