4.4 Article

An experimental investigation of the effects of point angle on the high-speed steel drills performance in drilling

Journal

MEASUREMENT & CONTROL
Volume 51, Issue 9-10, Pages 417-430

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0020294018797853

Keywords

Drill point angle; thrust force; tool wear; hole dimensional accuracy; surface roughness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The differences in the cutting speed are a serious problem along the cutting edge of the drill, in drilling operations. This problem can partly be solved reducing the length of the cutting edge via changing the drill point angle. In addition, in this study, the effect of point angle, feed rate, and cutting speed on drilling is investigated. For identifying the optimum cutting parameters, AISI 1050 steel alloy was selected as the experimental specimen, these specimen were pre-drilled 5 mm in diameter due to eliminating the effect of the chisel edge. In the experiments, the holes were drilled only at a depth of 10 mm in order not to give any harm to the dynamometer while measuring thrust force. For this aim, in drilling process, drills with point angle of 100 degrees, 118 degrees, 136 degrees, 154 degrees, and 172 degrees were selected. In conclusion, the thrust force, the tool wear, and the surface roughness linearly decreased with increasing point angles due to less removal chip area, in per revolve of the tool. However, the thrust force, the tool wear, and the surface roughness were adversely affected at higher feed rates and lower cutting speeds. The hole dimensional accuracy decreased at lower feed rates and cutting speeds but at higher point angles and concurrently at higher feed rates but lower point angles and cutting speeds. However, the hole dimensional accuracy showed more decisiveness at 118 degrees than other point angles, while the highest dimensional accuracy values recorded at 136 degrees point angle, at higher cutting speeds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available