4.6 Article

Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Mortality: Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study

Journal

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 87, Issue 10, Pages 944-952

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG06945, HL62508, R21DK088195]
  2. Coca-Cola Co, Atlanta, GA
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education [EX-2009-0899, EX-2010-1008]
  4. Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc, Champaign, IL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To analyze the relationship of ideal cardiovascular health to disease-specific death. Patients and Methods: We used data from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study from October 9, 1987, to March 3, 1999, to estimate the prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health in 11,993 individuals (24.3% women) and to examine its relationship with deaths from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Results: During a mean follow-up of 11.6 years, 305 deaths occurred: 70 (23.0%) from CVD and 127 (41.6%) from cancer. In the entire cohort, only 29 individuals (0.2%) had 7 ideal metrics. After adjusting for age, sex, examination year, alcohol intake, and parental history of CVD, risk of death due to CVD was 55% lower in those participants who met 3 or 4 ideal metrics (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.77) and 63% lower in those with 5 to 7 ideal metrics (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.95), compared with those who met 0 to 2 ideal metrics. Although not significant, there was also a trend toward lower risk of death due to all causes across incremental numbers of ideal metrics. No association was observed for deaths due to cancer. Conclusion: The prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health was extremely low in a middle-aged cohort of men and women recruited between 1987 and 1999. The American Heart Association construct reflects well the subsequent risk of CVD, as reflected by graded CVD mortality in relation to the number of ideal metrics. (C) 2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research square Mayo Clin Proc. 2012:87(101:944-952

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available