4.6 Article

InterLACE: A new International Collaboration for a Life Course Approach to Women's Reproductive Health and Chronic Disease Events

Journal

MATURITAS
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 235-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.12.011

Keywords

Reproductive health; Chronic disease; Menopause; Life-course research; Women's health; Cross-cultural comparison

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1027196]
  2. MRC [MC_U123092720] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U123092720] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20240063] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence from population-based studies of women increasingly points to the inter-related nature of reproductive health, lifestyle, and chronic disease risk. This paper describes the recently established International Collaboration for a Life Course Approach to Reproductive Health and Chronic Disease. InterLACE aims to advance the evidence base for women's health policy beyond associations from disparate studies by means of systematic and culturally sensitive synthesis of longitudinal data. Currently InterLACE draws on individual level data for reproductive health and chronic disease among 200,000 women from over thirteen studies of women's health in seven countries. The rationale for this multi-study research programme is set out in terms of a life course perspective to reproductive health. The research programme will build a comprehensive picture of reproductive health through life in relation to chronic disease risk. Although combining multiple international studies poses methodological challenges, InterLACE represents an invaluable opportunity to strength evidence to guide the development of timely and tailored preventive health strategies. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available