4.6 Article

Menopause and modifiable coronary heart disease risk factors: A population based study

Journal

MATURITAS
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 237-243

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.11.023

Keywords

Coronary heart disease risk factors; Menopause; Lipids; Epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the effect of the menopause on various coronary heart disease (CHID) risk factors and on the global risk of CHD in a population based sample of women, making the difference between menopause and age related effects. Study design: The Third French MONICA cross-sectional survey on cardiovascular risk included 1730 randomly selected women, aged 35-64 years, representative from the general population. Main outcome measures: Women were defined as post-menopausal (postM; n=696), peri-menopausal (periM; n=183) or pre-menopausal (preM; n=659) based on the date of last menses. Socio-demographic, clinical and biological data were collected. Analyses of variance were used to compare means. Results: PostM women had significantly higher age-adjusted levels of total cholesterol (6.0mmol/L in postM vs. 5.7 mmol/L in preM, p < 0.05) and LDL cholesterol (3.9 mmol/L vs. 3.6 mmol/L, p < 0.05). There was no difference in HDL cholesterol or triglyceride levels, glycemia or blood pressure. Further adjustment on body mass index and hormonal treatments did not modify the results. No risk factor was significantly different between periM and postM. However, the Framingham 10-year risk of CHD was higher in postM, as compared with periM (5.1 % vs. 5.0%, p < 0.05). In postM women, lipids and the Framingham risk were not associated with elapsed time since menopause. Conclusions: The CHD risk increases during the sixth decade could be explained not only by estrogen deprivation but also by an effect on lipid profile, which is likely to occur in the peri-menopause period.. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available