4.6 Article

Aged garlic extract lowers blood pressure in patients with treated but uncontrolled hypertension: A randomised controlled trial

Journal

MATURITAS
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 144-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.06.001

Keywords

Cardiovascular health; Uncontrolled hypertension; Aged garlic extract; Complementary medicine

Funding

  1. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the effect, tolerability and acceptability of aged garlic extract as an adjunct treatment to existing antihypertensive medication in patients with treated, but uncontrolled, hypertension. Design: A double-blind parallel randomised placebo-controlled trial involving 50 patients whose routine clinical records in general practice documented treated but uncontrolled hypertension. The active treatment group received four capsules of aged garlic extract (960 mg containing 2.4 mg S-allylcysteine) daily for 12 weeks, and the control group received matching placebos. The primary outcome measures were systolic and diastolic blood pressure at baseline, 4,8 and 12 weeks, and change over time. We also assessed tolerability during the trial and acceptability at 12 weeks. Results: In patients with uncontrolled hypertension (SBP >= 140 mm Hg at baseline), systolic blood pressure was on average 10.2 +/- 4.3 mm Hg (p = 0.03) lower in the garlic group compared with controls over the 12-week treatment period. Changes in blood pressure between the groups were not significant in patients with SBP < 140 mm Hg at baseline. Aged garlic extract was generally well tolerated and acceptability of trial treatment was high (92%). Conclusion: Our trial suggests that aged garlic extract is superior to placebo in lowering systolic blood pressure similarly to current first line medications in patients with treated but uncontrolled hypertension. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available