4.6 Article

Data-driven estimation in equilibrium using inverse optimization

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages 595-633

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-014-0819-4

Keywords

Equilibrium; Nonparametric estimation; Utility estimation; Traffic assignment

Funding

  1. NSF [EFRI-0735974, CNS-1239021, IIS-1237022]
  2. DOE [DE-FG52-06NA27490]
  3. ARO [W911NF-11-1-0227, W911NF-12-1-0390]
  4. ONR [N00014-10-1-0952]
  5. Citigroup
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1237022] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  9. Directorate For Engineering [1239021] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Equilibrium modeling is common in a variety of fields such as game theory and transportation science. The inputs for these models, however, are often difficult to estimate, while their outputs, i.e., the equilibria they are meant to describe, are often directly observable. By combining ideas from inverse optimization with the theory of variational inequalities, we develop an efficient, data-driven technique for estimating the parameters of these models from observed equilibria. We use this technique to estimate the utility functions of players in a game from their observed actions and to estimate the congestion function on a road network from traffic count data. A distinguishing feature of our approach is that it supports both parametric and nonparametric estimation by leveraging ideas from statistical learning (kernel methods and regularization operators). In computational experiments involving Nash and Wardrop equilibria in a nonparametric setting, we find that a) we effectively estimate the unknown demand or congestion function, respectively, and b) our proposed regularization technique substantially improves the out-of-sample performance of our estimators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available