4.6 Article

Maximizing a class of submodular utility functions

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING
Volume 128, Issue 1-2, Pages 149-169

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-009-0298-1

Keywords

Expected utility maximization; Combinatorial auctions; Competitive facility location; Submodular function maximization; Polyhedra

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-08-1-0117]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMI0700203]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0758234] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given a finite ground set N and a value vector a is an element of R-N, we consider optimization problems involving maximization of a submodular set utility function of the form h(S) = f(Sigma(i is an element of S)a(i)), S subset of N, where f is a strictly concave, increasing, differentiable function. This utility function appears frequently in combinatorial optimization problems when modeling risk aversion and decreasing marginal preferences, for instance, in risk-averse capital budgeting under uncertainty, competitive facility location, and combinatorial auctions. These problems can be formulated as linear mixed 0-1 programs. However, the standard formulation of these problems using submodular inequalities is ineffective for their solution, except for very small instances. In this paper, we perform a polyhedral analysis of a relevant mixed-integer set and, by exploiting the structure of the utility function h, strengthen the standard submodular formulation significantly. We show the lifting problem of the submodular inequalities to be a submodular maximization problem with a special structure solvable by a greedy algorithm, which leads to an easily-computable strengthening by subadditive lifting of the inequalities. Computational experiments on expected utility maximization in capital budgeting show the effectiveness of the new formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available