4.3 Article

An Exact Algorithm for Bilevel 0-1 Knapsack Problems

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 2012, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2012/504713

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [SFRH/BPD/64766/2009]
  2. Algoritmi Research Center of the University of Minho for Claudio Alves and Jose Valerio de Carvalho
  3. International Campus on Safety and Intermodality in Transportation
  4. Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region
  5. European Community
  6. Regional Delegation for Research and Technology
  7. Ministry of Higher Education and Research
  8. National Center for Scientific Research for Said Hanafi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a new exact method for solving bilevel 0-1 knapsack problems. A bilevel problem models a hierarchical decision process that involves two decision makers called the leader and the follower. In these processes, the leader takes his decision by considering explicitly the reaction of the follower. From an optimization standpoint, these are problems in which a subset of the variables must be the optimal solution of another (parametric) optimization problem. These problems have various applications in the field of transportation and revenue management, for example. Our approach relies on different components. We describe a polynomial time procedure to solve the linear relaxation of the bilevel 0-1 knapsack problem. Using the information provided by the solutions generated by this procedure, we compute a feasible solution (and hence a lower bound) for the problem. This bound is used together with an upper bound to reduce the size of the original problem. The optimal integer solution of the original problem is computed using dynamic programming. We report on computational experiments which are compared with the results achieved with other state-of-the-art approaches. The results attest the performance of our approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available