4.6 Article

REDUCED BASIS A POSTERIORI ERROR BOUNDS FOR THE STOKES EQUATIONS IN PARAMETRIZED DOMAINS: A PENALTY APPROACH

Journal

MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 2103-2134

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218202511005672

Keywords

Stokes equations; saddle point problems; penalty; reduced order model; reduced basis approximation; a posteriori error estimation; error bounds; greedy sampling; offline-online procedure; successive constraints method; real-time computation

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [GSC 111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present reduced basis approximations and associated rigorous a posteriori error bounds for the Stokes equations in parametrized domains. The method, built upon the penalty formulation for saddle point problems, provides error bounds not only for the velocity but also for the pressure approximation, while simultaneously admitting affine geometric variations with relative ease. The essential ingredients are: (i) dimension reduction through Galerkin projection onto a low-dimensional reduced basis space; (ii) stable, good approximation of the pressure through supremizer-enrichment of the velocity reduced basis space; (iii) optimal and numerically stable approximations identified through an efficient greedy sampling method; (iv) certainty, through rigorous a posteriori bounds for the errors in the reduced basis approximation; and (v) efficiency, through an offline-online computational strategy. The method is applied to a flow problem in a two-dimensional channel with a (parametrized) rectangular obstacle. Numerical results show that the reduced basis approximation converges rapidly, the effectivities associated with the (inexpensive) rigorous a posteriori error bounds remain good even for reasonably small values of the penalty parameter, and that the effects of the penalty parameter are relatively benign.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available