4.4 Article

TYPE 2 NEOVASCULARIZATION SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION IMAGED BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY

Journal

RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 2212-2218

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000773

Keywords

age-related macular degeneration; choroidal neovascularization; Type 2 neovascularization; OCT-angiography

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Optical coherence tomography angiography is a novel and noninvasive technique for imaging retinal microvasculature by detecting changes in reflectivity that is related to blood flow. The purpose of this study was to describe Type 2 neovascularization characteristics in age-related macular degeneration using optical coherence tomography angiography. Methods: Fourteen eyes of 14 consecutive patients with Type 2 neovascularization were prospectively included. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, including color and infrared fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography angiography, and optical coherence tomography angiography. Results: In all cases, Type 2 lesions could be detected by optical coherence tomography angiography, presenting as a hyperflow lesion in the outer retina, with a glomerulus (4/14) or medusa shape (10/14), surrounded by a dark halo. The superficial layer and the deep retina showed no abnormal flow. Surprisingly, the Type 2 lesions could also be observed in the presumed choriocapillaris layer. These glomerulus- or medusa-shaped lesions were connected, in 10/14 eyes, to a thicker main branch, which seemed to continue deep into the choroidal layers. Conclusion: Optical coherence tomography angiography may be a new imaging method for the diagnosis of Type 2 neovascularization in clinical routine. However, the specificity of the features needs to be investigated in further studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available