4.4 Article

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VISUAL PROGNOSIS AND DELAY OF INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF RANIBIZUMAB WHEN TREATING AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

Journal

RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1331-1338

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000513

Keywords

age-related macular degeneration; intravitreal injection; pro re nata; ranibizumab; visual prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Jichi Medical University
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  3. Santen Pharmaceutical
  4. Bayer Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:In age-related macular degeneration, various factors in clinical practice cause delays to arise between the time exudative change is observed and the time anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs are actually injected. We investigated the influence of injection delay on prognosis.Methods:Subjects were 50 eyes (50 patients from 2 hospitals) that were administered ranibizumab monotherapy for age-related macular degeneration for 1 year since exudative change was first observed. We investigated the mean number of delay days for each injection.Results:Mean injection delay was between 0 and 104 days. Significant prognostic factors for visual acuity were initial best-corrected visual acuity (P < 0.01) and mean injection delay (P = 0.03). We estimated that for an initial best-corrected visual acuity of 0.40 logMAR unit (20/50 Snellen equivalent), the respective best-corrected visual acuity values after 1 year for mean injection delays of 0, 7, 14, 28, and 56 days would be 0.22 (20/33), 0.24 (20/35), 0.26 (20/37), 0.31 (20/40), and 0.39 (20/49). For an initial best-corrected visual acuity of 0.097 (20/25), the respective values would be 0.054 (20/23), 0.075 (20/24), 0.10 (20/25), 0.14 (20/28), and 0.22 (20/33).Conclusion:Long-term visual acuity prognosis worsened when scheduling problems delayed intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available