4.7 Article

Photoelectrochemical solar water splitting using electrospun TiO2 nanofibers

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 328, Issue -, Pages 109-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.022

Keywords

Electrospinning; TiO2 nanofibers; Water splitting; Photo current density

Funding

  1. Human Resources Development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20124030200120]
  2. Global Frontier Program through the Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials (GFHIM) of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2013M3A6B1078879]
  3. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RGP-089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TiO2 nano-fibrous films of thicknesses ranging from 0.17 to 3.24 mu m were prepared on an indium-doped tin oxide substrate using an electrospinning technique for which the spinning time was varied from 5 to 60 min. The structural and morphological aspects were studied by means of XRD, Raman, and SEM analyses. The photoelectrochemical (PEC) properties of the films were tested by performing current potential measurements. The optimal PEC performance was explored by varying the experimental conditions, specifically, the spinning time (5-60 min) and the annealing temperature (300, 500, and 700 degrees C). A comparison of the PEC performance of all the NF film thicknesses (0.17, 0.31, 1.53, 2.16, 4.67, and 7.53 mu m) revealed that a thickness of 4.67 mu m, that is, a film formed by electrospinning over a duration of 45 min, exhibited the optimum level of PEC performance. This film generated a photocurrent of around 150 mu A/cm(2), which was larger than the PEC values produced by the other films. The PEC performance of the 7.53-mu m TiO2 NF film (produced by coating for 60 min) was found to be inferior to that of all the other thicknesses. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available