4.7 Article

In situ tensile study of PM-HIP and wrought 316 L stainless steel and Inconel 625 alloys with high energy diffraction microscopy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.083

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC under the DOE Idaho Operations [DE AC07 05ID14517]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences under NSF [DMR-1332208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-Energy Diffraction Microscopy (HEDM) was employed to measure and compare the evolving micromechanical state of two alloys, an austenitic stainless steel (316 L) and nickel-based alloy (Inconel 625) fabricated by both conventional methods and powder metallurgy with hot isostatic pressing (PM-HIP) during in situ uniaxial tensile testing. Each of the four materials was tested through the elastic regime to just beyond yield. HEDM was performed at room temperature in the far-field (ff) configuration at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source to measure grain-average elastic strains and subsequently derive stress tensors. The evolution of the normal stress component along the loading direction in individual grains as a function of macroscopic deformation is presented. Initially, grain-scale stresses in the loading direction are more heterogeneous in the wrought alloys than in the PM-HIP alloys. Notably, many peripheral grains in the wrought specimens are near yield even before load is applied. With increased loading, grain-scale stresses tend to homogenize in all specimens. Orientation fields measured using electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) are used to determine grain morphologies and interpret the ff-HEDM data. The PM-HIP grains tend to be finer and rounder in shape than the wrought grains, potentially explaining the grain-scale stress distributions. Finally, yield strength and modulus of elasticity are measured for the four alloys and correlated to the resultant grain size and morphology from the fabrication processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available