4.7 Article

Composite structure modeling and mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.024

Keywords

Metal-ceramic composite; Particle size analysis; Composite structural modeling; Particle-matrix interface; Mechanical behavior

Funding

  1. National Basic Research 973 Program [2042CB619600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [51131004]
  3. National High-Tech RD 863 Program [2012AA030311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work aims to investigate the relationship between the mechanical behavior and composite structure of silicon carbide (SiC) particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites. On account of newly developed particle size analysis technique, a large number of SiC particles are experimentally measured to provide statistical particular structural information. According to the statistical analysis and physical observations of SiC particles, the composite structures of SiC/Al composites are numerically reproduced in line with their actual microscopic structures, in which a developed structural modeling program can build the randomly dispersions of the particle sizes, the particle shapes, the particle positions and the volume fractions of SiC particles. Elastoplastic material properties, strengthened matrix properties and particle-matrix interfacial behaviors are introduced to simulate the mechanical behavior of SiC/Al composites. Enough fine meshes and reasonable loads and boundaries conditions can efficiently guarantee the computing accuracy and reduce the computing cost. A lot of simulating results of SiC/AI composites are provided and verified with the related experimental results. This work makes an effective attempt to establish the relationship between the actual composite structures and the mechanical behaviors within the particle reinforced metal matrix composites. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available