4.7 Article

Hydrothermal synthesis of FeWO4-graphene composites and their photocatalytic activities under visible light

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 351, Issue -, Pages 474-479

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.159

Keywords

FeWO4; Reduced graphene oxide; Visible light irradiation; Photocatalytic degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475047]
  2. Key Academic Program of the 3rd phase 211 Project of South China Agricultural University [2009B010100001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monoclinic ferberite FeWO4-reduced graphene oxide (FeWO4-RGO) composites were hydrothermally fabricated by facile one-pot method in situ reduction of graphene oxide. As-prepared FeWO4-RGO photocatalysts were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Raman spectra, and diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS). The FeWO4-RGO photocatalysts and pure FeWO4 photocatalyst had a similar particle size, which was in the range of 30-50 nm. FeWO4 and FeWO4-RGO photocatalysts showed absorption in the visible region, and the band gap energy of FeWO4 decreased slightly after RGO coupling. FeWO4-RGO photocatalysts exhibited high efficiencies in photocatalytic degradation of dye pollutant Rhodamine B (RhB) in solution under visible light irradiation (a 4W Light Emitting Diode lamp). All FeWO4-RGO photocatalysts under visible light showed higher photocatalytic activities than pure FeWO4 photocatalyst, and FeWO4-0.3RGO showed the best photocatalytic activity. The FeWO4-RGO composites were formed through the chemical contact between nanometer FeWO4 particles and RGO, and RGO could act as a good electron acceptor. The enhancement in visible-light photocatalytic performance may be mainly attributed to the effective separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available