4.7 Article

Influences of composition and grain size on creep-rupture behavior of Inconel® alloy 740

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.087

Keywords

Code case 2702; Eta phase; Nickel-based superalloy; Grain size; Creep-rupture ductility; Inconel 740H

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy, Advanced Research Materials Program
  2. ORNL SHaRE User Center, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US DOE [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  3. UT-Battelle, LLC
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-FG26-01NT41175]
  5. Ohio Coal Development Office of the Ohio Department of Development [CDO/D-0020, D-05-02A]
  6. A-USC consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Creep-rupture experiments were conducted on multiple heats of the nickel-based superalloy Inconel 740 at temperatures between 923 and 1123 K (650 and 850 degrees C). The interactions between chemistry, microstructure, and creep performance were evaluated by analysis of creep data, optical microscopy, electron microscopy, and computational thermodynamics. The data show that grain size has a modest effect on the creep-rupture strength. Computational thermodynamics verified experimental observations of the formation of eta phase as a function of temperature and alloy chemistry, but the kinetics for the precipitation of eta phase did not agree with the experimental findings. Despite the formation of eta phase and the concomitant reduction in volume fraction of gamma prime, the creep resistance of the alloy is insensitive, within the range of chemistries tested, to the volume fraction of gamma prime. The creep ductility was found to increase with test temperature. Precipitation of a large volume fraction of eta phase (greater than 7%) appears to reduce the creep-rupture ductility, but smaller amounts do not produce adverse effects. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available