4.7 Article

Fabrication of aluminum-alumina metal matrix composites via cold gas dynamic spraying at low pressure followed by friction stir processing

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.066

Keywords

Aluminum; Alumina; Cold spraying; Hardness; Mean free path; Metal matrix composites

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Government of Alberta Small Equipment Grants Program (SEGP)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Canadian Centre for Welding and Joining (CCWJ) at the University of Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cold gas dynamic spraying at low pressure (1 MPa gage or 150 psig) was used to fabricate Al-Al2O3 metal matrix composite (MMC) coatings onto 6061 Al alloy. The powder contained Al powder admixed with -10 mu m Al2O3 in fractions up to 90 wt.%. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Vickers microhardness testing, and image analysis were conducted to determine the microstructure, properties, and volume fraction of reinforcing particles in the coatings. The coatings were then friction-stir processed (FSP) at tool rotation speeds of 894 or 1723 RPM using a flat cylindrical tool. The Al2O3 content and hardness of the final MMC coatings increased with increasing fractions of Al2O3 particles in the feedstock powder, resulting in a maximum Al2O3 content of 48 wt.% and a hardness of 85 HV of the as-sprayed coating when 90 wt.% Al2O3 was used in the feed powder blend. After FSP, the hardness of the MMC increased to a maximum of 137 HV. The as-sprayed coatings contained Al2O3 particles that were segregated between the Al particles, and FSP was effective in dispersing these Al2O3 particles and decreasing their mean free path. It was suggested that this re-distribution and Al2O3 particle size refinement during FSP improved the hardness of the MMC coatings. Crown Copyright (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available