4.7 Article

Static and dynamic mechanical properties of concrete after high temperature exposure

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.058

Keywords

Concrete; After high temperature exposure; Mechanical property; SHPB; Strain rate effect; Toughness

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078350]
  2. Province Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi [2010JQ6011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this paper is to investigate the static and dynamic mechanical properties of concrete before and after high temperature exposure. Quasi-static and impact loading experiments were carried out on concrete before and after exposure to the temperature of 200-800 degrees C by using a servo-hydraulic testing machine and a 100-mm-diameter split Hopkinson bar (SHPB) apparatus, respectively. The results show that, mechanical properties of concrete after high temperature exposure change evidently, and the critical temperature for those changes acquiring dramatic character is 400 degrees C. With the rise of temperature up to 400 degrees C, compressive strength and critical strain change little compared with that of at room temperature. While with temperature increasing from 400 to 800 degrees C, the decrease in strength and the increase in critical strain become obvious. Consequentially, specific energy absorption (SEA), which is the synthetic exhibition of strength and ductility, decreases much less than those observed for strength over 400 degrees C. Dynamic compressive mechanical properties of concrete before and after high temperature exposure increase with the rise in strain rate rapidly, which exhibits strong strain rate dependency. Dynamic increase factor (DIF) increases approximately linearly with strain rate. In a word, concrete can be recognized as an excellent thermal-resistant and anti-impact construction material. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available