4.7 Article

The effects of texture and extension twinning on the low-cycle fatigue behavior of a rolled magnesium alloy, AZ31B

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.047

Keywords

Magnesium; Low-cycle fatigue; Texture; Twinning; Neutron diffraction; Synchrotron diffraction

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EEC-9527527, DMR-0231320]
  2. Office of Basic Energy Science (DOE) [FWP 06SCPE401]
  3. Los Alamos National Security LLC under DOE [DE AC52 06NA25396]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [836402] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [836402] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of texture on the low-cycle fatigue behavior of a rolled magnesium alloy, AZ31B, was studied at room temperature. It is shown that the Coffin-Manson and Basquin relationships can be used to describe the fatigue resistance of the alloy. The alloy loaded along the rolling direction exhibits only slightly better low-cycle fatigue resistance than that loaded along the transverse direction, due to the in-plane texture symmetry. The in-plane cases exhibit better fatigue behavior than the through-thickness loading. Neutron diffraction and synchrotron diffraction were employed to assist in making mechanistic understandings for the findings. The fundamental difference in the low-cycle fatigue behaviors between the in-plane and through-thickness loadings is attributed to the different activation sequences of twinning and detwinning mechanisms involved and, particularly, the greater requirement for c-axis compression of the grains during the through-thickness tests. The different activation sequences are essentially determined by the initial crystallographic texture, such that the inverted hysteresis-loop shapes are observed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available