4.7 Article

Effect of moisture absorption on the mechanical properties of randomly oriented natural fibers/polyester hybrid composite

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.027

Keywords

Polymer-matrix composite; Moisture absorption; Natural fibers; Mechanical properties; Theoretical model; Statistical model

Funding

  1. Mechanical Engineering Deparment, Kalasalingam University, Krishnankovil, Srivilliputtur

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the variation of mechanical properties such as tensile, flexural, and impact strengths of roselle and sisal fibers hybrid polyester composite at dry and wet conditions were studied. The composites of roselle/sisal polyester-based hybrid composites with different weight% of fibers were prepared. Roselle and sisal fibers at a ratio of 1:1 had been incorporated in unsaturated polyester resin at various fiber lengths. When the fiber content and length of the roselle and sisal fibers were increased, the tensile and flexural strength of the composite increased. When the samples were subjected to moisture environment, decrease in tensile and flexural strength was observed. The maximum percentage of strength reductions in tensile and flexural strength were observed for the composites having the fiber length of 150 mm and 30wt% fiber content. For impact strength, it was with the composites of 20 wt% and 150 mm at wet conditions compared to dry conditions. The percentage of strength reductions increased with fiber content and length in wet conditions. A scatter in the impact strength values was identified on both the conditions. The moisture absorption characteristics of the natural fibers are very important to produce the natural fiber hybrid composite materials with the positive hybrid effect. The experimental results are compared with theoretical and empirical or statistical results and found to be in good agreement. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available