4.7 Article

Vickers Indentation Fracture (VIF) modeling to analyze multi-cracking toughness of titania, alumina and zirconia plasma sprayed coatings

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.058

Keywords

Al2O3; TiO2; ZrO2; Hardness; Toughness and toughening; Surfaces

Funding

  1. Action de Recherche Concertee d'Initiative Regionale ARCIR-CECET Project
  2. Region Nord-Pas-de-Calais of France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For massive brittle materials, the fracture toughness in mode 1, K-IC, can be determined using various reliable techniques. Besides, Vickers Indentation Fracture (VIF) technique has been developed to locally determine fracture toughness. However, since the indentation test generates a complex three-dimensional crack system around the indent, fracture toughness, K-C, is calculated instead of K-IC. Consequently some authors rightly reject the VIF technique to determine standard fracture toughness by arguing that the literature counts numerous VIF crack equations thus revealing discrepancies of this technique. Nevertheless in some cases (e.g. brittle ceramic coatings) inclusive material techniques are not applicable since presence of the substrate and/or multi-crack network can modify the crack propagation into the coating. In this work, we employed VIF technique to study multi-cracking behavior of titania, alumina and zirconia ceramic oxide coatings obtained by plasma spraying. To calculate VIF toughness, we propose (i) to select two crack equations for radial-median and Palmqvist cracking modes respectively, (ii) to adjust the crack equation of Miranzo and Moya for intermediate cracking mode. (iii) to develop a mathematical approach to determine the cracking mode, (iv) to take into account the multi-crack network by defining an equivalent four-crack system and (v) to propose a universal crack equation applicable independently of the cracking mode. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available