4.3 Article

Doxorubicin loaded folate-targeted carbon nanotubes: Preparation, cellular internalization, in vitro cytotoxicity and disposition kinetic study in the isolated perfused rat liver

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.055

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Targeted drug delivery; Doxorubicin; Liver perfusion; HeLa cell

Funding

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to use the functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the delivery of doxorubicin (DOX). Polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains are attached to CNTs then folate-conjugation of PEGylated CNTs was prepared. The amount of drug loading was calculated by the Multivariate Calibration Method for simultaneous quantification of DOX and CNTs. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the folate receptor-positive HeLa cell line. To assess distribution and elimination of free DOX and drug-loaded CNTs, a recirculating rat liver perfusion system was used and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Loading efficiency of 84.3 +/- 3.1% and 49.3 +/- 5.4% was calculated for low-PEGylated and high-PEGylated CNTs respectively. A higher release rate of DOX was achieved at a higher amount of PEGylation. Folate-targeted CNTs expressed a 3.2-fold decrease in IC50 value compared with non-targeted CNTs. The result from liver perfusion experiments revealed that DOX accumulation in the liver was higher when PEGylation was lower. There was a 2.4-fold decrease in the elimination rate constant compared to free DOX, which was attributed to the redistribution of DOX from hepatocytes in a sustained release pattern that is consistent with an increase in the mean residence time and prolonged circulation. In conclusion, folate-targeted CNTs show great potential as a targeted anticancer delivery system. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available