4.3 Article

Process engineering of high voltage alginate encapsulation of mesenchymal stem cells

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.11.048

Keywords

Alginate encapsulation; High voltage; Electra-spraying; Spherical beads; Scaling up; Mesenchymal stem cells

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG German Research Foundation) through a scholarship by the Cluster of Excellence REBIRTH (From Regenerative Biology to Reconstructive Therapy, DFG) [EXC 62/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Encapsulation of stem cells in alginate beads is promising as a sophisticated drug delivery system in treatment of a wide range of acute and chronic diseases. However, common use of air flow encapsulation of cells in alginate beads fails to produce beads with narrow size distribution, intact spherical structure and controllable sizes that can be scaled up. Here we show that high voltage encapsulation (>= 15 kV) can be used to reproducibly generate spherical alginate beads (200-400 mu m) with narrow size distribution (+/- 5-7%) in a controlled manner under optimized process parameters. Flow rate of alginate solution ranged from 0.5 to 10 ml/h allowed producing alginate beads with a size of 320 and 350 mu m respectively, suggesting that this approach can be scaled up. Moreover, we found that applied voltages (15-25 kV) did not alter the viability and proliferation of encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells post-encapsulation and cryopreservation as compared to air flow. We are the first who employed a comparative analysis of electro-spraying and air flow encapsulation to study the effect of high voltage on alginate encapsulated cells. This report provides background in application of high voltage to encapsulate living cells for further medical purposes. Long-term comparison and work on alginate-cell interaction within these structures will be forthcoming. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available