4.3 Article

Silk fibroin porous scaffolds for nucleus pulposus tissue engineering

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.012

Keywords

Tissue engineering; Intervertebral discs (IVD); Nucleus pulposus (NP); Porous scaffold; Silk fibroin

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000432, 81272046, 51173084]
  2. National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) [2011CB606202]
  3. Major Scientific and Technological Issues of the Tianjin Health Bureau [10KG113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intervertebral discs (IVDs) are structurally complex tissue that hold the vertebrae together and provide mobility to spine. The nucleus pulposus (NP) degeneration often results in degenerative IVD disease that is one of the most common causes of back and neck pain. Tissue engineered nucleus pulposus offers an alternative approach to regain the function of the degenerative IVD. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of porous silk fibroin (SF) scaffolds fabricated by paraffin-sphere-leaching methods with freeze-drying in the application of nucleus pulposus regeneration. The prepared scaffold possessed high porosity of 92.38 +/- 5.12% and pore size of 165.00 +/- 8.25 mu m as well as high pore interconnectivity and appropriate mechanical properties. Rabbit NP cells were seeded and cultured on the SF scaffolds. Scanning electron microscopy, histology, biochemical assays and mechanical tests revealed that the porous scaffolds could provide an appropriate microstructure and environment to support adhesion, proliferation and infiltration of NP cells in vitro as well as the generation of extracellular matrix. The NP cell-scaffold construction could be preliminarily formed after subcutaneously implanted in a nude mice model. In conclusion, The SF porous scaffold offers a potential candidate for tissue engineered NP tissue. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available