4.3 Article

Attachment and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on laser-ablated titanium implant material

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.06.020

Keywords

Titanium implant; Laser ablation; Surface modification; MG-63 osteoblasts; Cell attachment and proliferation

Funding

  1. Hungarian Ministry of Health [ETT-434/2006]
  2. OTKA [K67818]
  3. French-Hungarian Bilateral Intergovernmental S&T cooperation grants [TET_10-1-2011-0708]
  4. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Demand is increasing for shortening the long (3-6 months) osseointegration period to rehabilitate patients' damaged chewing apparatus in as short a time as possible. For dental implants, as for biomaterials in general, the bio- and osseointegration processes can be controlled at molecular and cellular levels by modification of the implant surface. One of the most promising of such surface modifications is laser ablation, as demonstrated by our previous results [46]. Commercially pure (CP4) sand-blasted, acid-etched titanium disks (Denti (R) System Ltd., Hungary) were irradiated with a KrF excimer laser (248 nm, fluence 0.4 J/cm(2), FWHM 18 ns, 2000 pulses), or with a Nd:YAG laser (532 nm, 1.3 J/cm(2), 10 ns, 200 pulses) then examined by SEM, AFM, and XPS. In vitro attachment (24 h) and proliferation (72 h) of MG-63 osteoblast cells were investigated via dimethylthiazol-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (KM, alamarBlue (AB) assays alkaline phosphatase quantification (ALP) and SEM. SEM and AFM revealed significant changes in morphology and roughness. XPS confirmed the presence of TiO2 on each sample; after Nd:YAG treatment a reduced state of Ti (Ti3+) was also observed. MTT, AB and ALP measurements detected an increase in the number of cells between the 24- and 72 hour observations; however, laser treatment did not affect cell attachment and proliferation significantly. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available