4.3 Article

Application of human amniotic mesenchymal cells as an allogeneic transplantation cell source in bone regenerative therapy

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.07.021

Keywords

Allogeneic cell transplantation; Mesenchymal stem cells; Amniotic mesenchymal cells; Bone regenerative therapy; Calcium phosphate scaffold

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [22791966]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22590498, 22791966] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autogenous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have therapeutic applications in bone regenerative therapy due to their pluripotency. However, the ability of MSCs to proliferate and differentiate varies between donors. Furthermore, alternative sources of MSCs are required for patients with contraindications to autogenous cell therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of mesenchymal cells from the human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a source of cells for allogeneic transplantation in bone regenerative therapy. Cells that retained a proliferative capacity of more than 50 population doubling level were distinguished from other HAM cells as HAM alpha cells and induced to osteogenic status-their in vivo osteogenesis was subsequently investigated in rats. It was found that HAM alpha cells were spindle shaped and were positive for MSC markers and negative for hematopoietic stem cell markers. Alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition increased with osteogenic status of HAM alpha cells. The expression of osteocalcin mRNA was increased in HAM alpha cells cultured on calcium phosphate scaffolds. Moreover, xenografted HAM alpha cells remained viable and produced extracellular matrix for several weeks. Thus, this study suggests that human amniotic mesenchymal cells possess osteogenic differentiation potential and could be applied to allogeneic transplantation in bone regenerative therapy. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available