4.3 Article

Highly porous and interconnected starch-based scaffolds: Production, characterization and surface modification

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.04.019

Keywords

Biomaterials; Processing; Starch; Surface modification; 3D scaffolds

Funding

  1. European NoE EXPER-TISSUES [NMP3-CT-2004-500283]
  2. EU Marie Curie Actions
  3. Alea Jacta Est [MEST-CT-2004-008104]
  4. FCT [PTDC/CTM/67560/2006]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTM/67560/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A convenient and straightforward process for preparation of highly porous and interconnected fiber mesh scaffolds with 50 wt.% content of starch is described. The proposed methodology avoids some of the previous encountered problems associated with the processing of starch-based materials such as thermal degradation, starch entrapment in the material bulk and inability to control/minimise the thickness of the fibers obtained by melt spinning, or low porosity and lack of interconnectivity for the scaffolds obtained by extrusion or injection moulding with blowing agent. Topographical characterisation of the obtained fibers revealed rough surface commonly related with increased cell attachment and growth. The in vitro tests with osteoblast cell line confirmed this trend and we observed higher cell number with increasing of the culture time. These results were also associated with protein adsorption from a complex solution where predominant adsorption of vitronectin over fibronectin was detected. Finally, a model modification by plasma was also carried out in order to confirm the versatility of these scaffolds by the possibility to further upgrade them via surface functionalisation. The in vitro tests confirmed that osteoblast-like cells proliferate faster on the modified scaffolds, which allows shortening the time needed for culturing prior to implantation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available