4.5 Article

Emphysema and DLCO predict a clinically important difference for 6MWD decline in COPD

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages 882-889

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.04.009

Keywords

Six-minute walk distance; Emphysema; %LAA; CT; COPD

Funding

  1. Fondo Nacional de Ciencias y Tecnologia (FONDECYT) [1080671]
  2. NIH [HL118714]
  3. Brigham and Women's Hospital Minority Faculty Career Development Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Exercise impairment is a central feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for 6-min walk distance (6MWD) decline (>30 m) has been associated with increased mortality. The predictors of the MCID are not fully known. We hypothesize that physiological factors and radiographic measures predict the MCID. Methods: We assessed 121 COPD subjects during 2 years using clinical variables, computed tomographic (CT) measures of emphysema, and functional measures including diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). The association between an MCID for 6MWD and clinical, CT, and physiologic predictors was assessed using logistic analysis. The C-statistic was used to assess the predictive ability of the models. Results: Forty seven (39%) subjects had an MCID. In an imaging-based model, log emphysema and age were the best predictors of MCID (emphysema Odds Ratio [OR] 2.47 95% CI [1.28 -4.76]). In a physiologic model, DLCO, age, and male gender were selected the best predictors (DLCO OR 1.19 [1.08-1.31]). The C-statistic for the ability of these models to predict an MCID was 0.71 and 0.75, respectively. Conclusion: In COPD patients the burden of emphysema on CT scan and DLCO predict a clinically meaningful decline in exercise capacity. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available