4.6 Article

The waterborne polyurethane dispersions based on polycarbonate diol: Effect of ionic content

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 277-285

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.11.057

Keywords

Coatings; Chemical synthesis; Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA); Thermodynamic properties

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [III 45022, III 45020]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Czech Science Foundation) [P108/10/0195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three water-based polyurethane dispersions (PUD) were synthesized by modified dispersing procedure using polycarbonate diol (PCD), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), triethylamine (TEA) and ethylenediamine (EDA). The ionic group content in the polyurethane-ionomer structure was varied by changing the amount of the internal emulsifier, DMPA (4.5, 7.5 and 10 wt.% to the prepolymer weight). The expected structures of obtained materials were confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. The effect of the DMPA content on the thermal properties of polyurethane films was measured by TGA, DTA, DSC and DMTA methods. Increased DMPA amounts result in the higher hard segment contents and in the increase of the weight loss corresponding to the degradation of the hard segments. The reduction of hard segment content led to the elevated temperature of decomposition and to the decrease of the glass transition temperature and thermoplasticity. The atomic force microscopy (AFM), results indicated that phase separation between hard and soft segment of PUD with higher DMPA content is more significant than of PUD with lower DMPA content. The physico-mechanical properties, such as hardness, adhesion test and gloss of the dried films were also determined considering the effect of DMPA content on coating properties. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available