4.6 Article

Significant improvement in the thermoelectric properties of zwitterionic polysquaraine composite films

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 141, Issue 2-3, Pages 920-928

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.06.024

Keywords

Polymer; Composite materials; Electrical conductivity; Thermoelectric effects

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan [NSC100-2221-E009-023-MY3, NSC 99-2221-E009-010-MY3, 101-2218-E-035-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the polysquaraine SQI(0.1), a zwitterionic pi-conjugated polymer, was adopted as the matrix for the preparation of flexible and freestanding films; the low band gap of this semiconducting polymer made it a natural choice for use as a thermoelectric (TE) polymer. To enhance their TE applications, both single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and mesoporous carbon (i.e., CMK-3) were integrated into the SQI(0.1)-based films and the effects of doping with iodine were also investigated. Using scanning electron microscopy, the variations in morphology of these SQI(0.1)-based films were examined. Raman spectroscopy was used to study the pi-pi interactions between iodine and the carbon materials (Le., SWNT, CMK-3); X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy to investigate the intercalation of the doped iodine in the composite films; and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to determine the valence state of the doped iodine. The TE properties of these materials were characterized in terms of the electrical conductivity (sigma), thermal conductivity (kappa), and Seebeck coefficient (S). The TE properties of the iodine-doped composite film prepared from SWNTs, CMK-3, and SQI(0.1) included a notable value of ZT (Figure of Merit) of 4.563 x 10(-3), which was 143% of that of the corresponding iodine-doped SQI(0.1) film. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available