4.6 Article

Preparation, chemistry and physical properties of bone-derived hydroxyapatite particles having a negative zeta potential

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 132, Issue 2-3, Pages 446-452

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.051

Keywords

Biomaterials; Ceramics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal bone-derived calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) particles were produced and characterized. Adult bovine femoral bone was boiled, washed, cleaned and heated in air at 700 C for 2 h. The resulting macroporous solid was ground, crushed and sieved into particles <50 mu m. SEM showed the particles were agglomerations of crystals similar to 50-500 nm across. XRD showed highly crystalline HA with nominal MgO and no detectable CaO. FTIR spectroscopy yielded typical HA absorptions, plus absorptions at 1457 and 1412 cm(-1) (MgCO3 or CaCO3) and 874 cm(-1) (CaHPO4). Main elements by EDXRF were Ca and P (molar ratio 1.93 vs. theoretical ratio 1.67). Minor amounts of Si, Mg and Na were detected, plus traces of K, Sr, Zn, Ba, V, Al, Mn, Pb, Cu and Fe. EDX detected Ca, P, Na and Mg. BET gas adsorption surface area was similar to 2.23 m(2) g(-1) and theoretical particle size similar to 857 nm. Laser DLS indicated similar to 40% of particles were 952 nm in diameter, plus similar to 50% were similar to 760 nm - in close agreement with BET calculations. By laser Doppler electrophoresis (LDE) the zeta potential of the bone-derived HA particles suspended in 0.154 M NaCl was negative for pH 6-11 and -9.25 +/- 0.9 mV at pH 7.4. Negative zeta potential is reported to favor attachment and proliferation of bone cells. HA particles produced synthetically are reported to have positive zeta potentials. The source of the negative potential was not determined but may stem from factors peculiar to producing HA particles from bone. The results suggest further investigation for biomedical use. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available