4.3 Article

Influence of FkpA variants on survival and replication of Cronobacter spp. in human macrophages

Journal

RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 3, Pages 186-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.02.005

Keywords

Cronobacter spp.; THP-1; Macrophage survival; CLSM; FkpA; Virulence factor

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_138533/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_138533] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Members of the genus Cronobacter are responsible for cases of meningitis and bacteremia with high fatality rates in neonates. Macrophage uptake of invading microbes is an innate process, and it has been proposed that macrophage infectivity potentiator (Mip) like proteins enhance the ability of pathogens to survive within macrophages. Cronobacter harbor the mip-like gene fkpA, but its role in intracellular survival of these bacteria in human macrophages has not yet been studied. Application of gentamicin exclusion assays and human THP-1 macrophage cells revealed significant differences in the capablility of Cronobacter species to survive and replicate within macrophages. Analysis to the amino acid level revealed both length and sequence variations in FkpA proteins among species. In this study, we addressed the possible influence of FkpA variants in intracellular survival of Cronobacter spp. in human macrophages, by knocking out the fkpA genes in two different Cronobacter strains and subsequent complementation with variants of the fkpA genes. Our results provide strong evidence that, in Cronobacter spp., FkpA must be considered a virulence factor, but its influence on macrophage survival and replication varies among strains and/or species due to the presence of amino acid variations. (C) 2015 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available