4.7 Article

Influence of porosity and relative humidity on consolidation of dolostone with calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: Effectiveness assessment with non-destructive techniques

Journal

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 168-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.11.007

Keywords

Calcium hydroxide nanoparticles; Stone; Consolidation; Humidity; Porosity; Non-destructive techniques

Funding

  1. Government of the Community of Madrid [CM 0505/MAT/0094]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CSD2007-0058]
  3. Microscopy and Citommetry Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slaked lime (Ca(OH)(2)) nanoparticles were exposed at 33% and 75% relative humidity (RH) to consolidate dolostone samples used in historical buildings. Non-destructive techniques (NDT) were applied to determine the chemical, morphological, physical and hydric properties of the stone samples, before and after 20 days treatment. Morphological and mineralogical characterisation of the nanoparticles was performed. 75% RH favors the consolidation process studied under Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM-EDS), spectrophotometry, capillarity, water absorption under vacuum, ultrasound velocity, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (imaging and relaxometry) and Optical Surface Roughness analyses. At 75% RH the nanoparticles fill the pores and inter-crystalline dolomite grain contacts but do not favor calcite re-crystallization as it occurs at 33% RH. The ESEM, XRD and TEM analyses under 75% RH reveal the fast transformation of portlandite (Ca(OH)(2)) into vaterite (CaCO(3)), monohydrocalcite (CaCO(3)center dot H(2)O) and calcite (CaCO(3)), and eventually the physical and hydric properties of the stones significantly improve. New insights are provided for the assessment of consolidation effectiveness of porous carbonate stones with calcium hydroxide nanoparticles under optimum RH conditions combining several NDT. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available