Journal
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 71-82Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-008-9367-9
Keywords
Shrinkage; Shrinkage cracking; Relaxation; Self-compacting concrete; Mix design
Categories
Funding
- cemsuisse (Berne, Switzerland)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) used in Switzerland contains about 80 l/m(3) more volume of paste than conventionally vibrated concrete (CVC). Consequently, there are some systematic differences in the properties of the hardened concrete. Normally, shrinkage of SCC is higher than shrinkage of CVC. Therefore, risk of cracking in case of restrained deformations can be increased for SCC. In this study shrinkage of thirteen different SCC mixtures using volume of paste, water content, type of binder, grain size distribution or content of shrinkage reducing admixture (SRA) as variables was compared with shrinkage of three different CVC mixtures with constant volume of paste but variable w/b. Furthermore, the risk of cracking of the different SCC- and CVC-mixtures in restrained conditions was studied under constant and varying curing conditions. The results show that shrinkage is mainly depending on volume of paste. Due to the higher volume of paste, SCC displayed higher shrinkage than CVC. Adding an SRA was the only measure to reduce shrinkage of SCC to values of CVC. Restrained shrinkage cracking is depending on shrinkage rate, mechanical properties and drying velocity. For slow shrinkage stress development, cracking risk of SCC can be lower compared to CVC despite the higher shrinkage rate.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available