4.5 Article

Effects of Tilt Angle on the Properties of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welding Copper to Aluminum

Journal

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 255-263

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2014.994754

Keywords

Dissimilar; Friction; Macrostructure; Properties; Tilt; Welding

Funding

  1. Board of Research in Fusion Science and Technology (BRFST)
  2. Institute for Plasma Research (IPR), Gandhinagar, India [NFP/MAT/A10/04]
  3. Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University (PDPU), Gandhinagar, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present investigation, dissimilar materials such as electrolytic tough pitch copper, and aluminum 6061-T651 were welded by friction stir welding technology. Effects of tool tilt angle on the mechanical and metallurgical properties were studied experimentally for dissimilar material systems. In the present study, the tool tilt angle was varied from 0 degrees to 4 degrees with an interval of 1 degrees, while the other parameters such as rotational speed, welding speed, tool pin offset, and workpiece material position were kept constant. Macrostructure analysis, tensile test, macro hardness measurement, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive x-ray spectrographic tests were performed to evaluate the weld properties of dissimilar copper-aluminum joints. The results revealed that a defect free dissimilar copper-aluminum friction stir welding was achieved by tilt angles 2 degrees, 3 degrees, and 4 degrees. The maximum tensile strength was reported to be 117MPa and the macro hardness was reported to be 181 VH (in the nugget zone) at a tilt angle of 4 degrees. The macro hardness was increased as the tilt angle increases from 0 degrees to 4 degrees. In addition to this, the thermo-mechanically affected zone (at the copper side) was found to be the weakest zone for a dissimilar copper-aluminum friction stir welding system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available